Which statement best reflects the drawback of relying on printed materials for program evaluation?

Which statement best reflects the drawback of relying on printed materials for program evaluation?

• A. They are generally unreliable in terms of assessing results
• B. They guarantee audience recall
• C. They always provide precise metrics
• D. They are more expensive than digital tools

Answer: (C)

The main idea here is that printed materials often fall short when you need precise, actionable measurements from program evaluation. Printed surveys, reports, and handouts provide information only from those who choose to respond and in a static format that doesn’t lend itself to exact metrics. This can lead to response biases, ambiguous questions, and samples that don’t represent the whole audience. As a result, turning printed feedback into precise numbers or clear conclusions about impact is difficult and often unreliable. In practice, you may get counts or qualitative notes, but you don’t get the consistent, exact metrics that track changes over time or prove outcomes. That’s why relying on print alone tends to limit the accuracy of evaluation results.

The main idea here is that printed materials often fall short when you need precise, actionable measurements from program evaluation. Printed surveys, reports, and handouts provide information only from those who choose to respond and in a static format that doesn’t lend itself to exact metrics. This can lead to response biases, ambiguous questions, and samples that don’t represent the whole audience. As a result, turning printed feedback into precise numbers or clear conclusions about impact is difficult and often unreliable. In practice, you may get counts or qualitative notes, but you don’t get the consistent, exact metrics that track changes over time or prove outcomes. That’s why relying on print alone tends to limit the accuracy of evaluation results.